Download EXOPLANET OBSERVING FOR AMATEURS
Transcript
───────────────────────────────── Chapter 2 Observatory Tour ───────────────────────────────── Since I will be using real data to illustrate systematic errors I will describe my observing systems. Note the use of the word "systems" in the plural form. Even with one telescope it will matter whether you are configured Cassegrain or prime focus, and whether a dew shield is used, or whether a focal reducer lens is used, and where it's inserted. Every change of configuration will change the relative importance of the various systematic error sources. During the past year I have had three different telescopes, so I am aware of issues related to telescope design differences - such as the problems produced by meridian flips (i.e., Celestrons). All of these telescopes have had 14-inch apertures with catadioptic optics: Celestron CGE-1400, Meade RCX400 and Meade LX200GPS. Most of my illustrations will be with the last one. These are typical telescopes now in use by advanced amateurs for exoplanet transit observations. I use a sliding roof observatory located in Southern Arizona, at an altitude of 4660 feet. Atmospheric extinction values for B, V, R and I bands are typically 0.25, 0.16, 0.13 and 0.08 magnitude per air mass. Figure 2.01 “Hereford Arizona Observatory” with a canvas-covered sliding roof. The Minor Planet Center has assigned it a site code of G95. All control functions are performed by a computer in my house, using 100-foot cables in buried conduit (the control room is shown as Fig.s 2.03 and 2.04). For all Cassegrain configurations I use an SBIG AO-7 tip/tilt image stabilizer. It can usually 14