Download The DS2G Program User's Guide
Transcript
7 Region 1 Side Side Side Side 1 2 3 4 A surface (type 5). On the axis (type 1). An interface with side 1 of region 4 (type 7). An interface with side 2 of region 3 (type 7). Region 2 Side Side Side Side 1 2 3 4 On the axis (type 1). A surface (type 5). An interface with side 1 of region 3 (type 7). A stream boundary (type 3)*. Region 3 Side Side Side Side 1 2 3 4 An interface with side 3 of region 2 (type 7). An interface with side 4 of region 1 (type 7). An interface with side 1 of region 4 (type 7). A stream boundary (type 3)*. Region 4 Side 1 An interface with side 3 of region 1 and side 3 of region 3 (type 7). Side 2 On the axis (type 1). Side 3 A stream boundary (type 3). Side 4 A stream boundary (type 3)*. * For high Mach numbers, type 8 boundaries would be preferable. Side 3 of region 4 should be upstream of the disturbance. The boundary at the base is almost exact in the outer part of the flow as long as the x component of the velocity is well supersonic. Unless this boundary is very far downstream, there will be subsonic flow in the wake and some error in the flow. The magnitude of this could be determined by placing the downstream boundary at different locations. This system of flow boundaries has proved to be sufficiently flexible to cope with almost all flow problems that have been encountered. When an interface between regions lies along curved sides, the cell elements will match exactly only if they are equal in number and identically distributed along the interface. Any mismatch will result in small "gaps" or "overlaps" at the interface. The program procedures are designed to cope with this eventuality, but it greatly increases the normally very small probability of simulated molecules going "astray". It is strongly recommended that the cell divisions be chosen such that curved interfaces are exactly matched. There are no problems with cell size discontinuities across straight interfaces as far as the flow calculations are concerned. However, if contour output is chosen, the contours will be continuous across the region boundaries only if the cells match exactly. If the Knudsen number for the flow shown in Fig 2 was sufficiently small for the flow to be near-continuum, very thin cells would be necessary in the region of high vorticity near the surface. Should the desirable cell size lead to an excessively small number of simulated molecules in the cell, the problem can be overcome in a steady flow by calculating the boundary layer on a shorter time-scale. The number of molecules in the cell is increased by reducing the number of real molecules that are represented by each simulated molecule. If the time step is reduced by exactly the same fraction, the flux of molecules across the interfaces with the outer flow are exactly matched. This simultaneous change in DTM and FNUM is ideal for flows in the stagnation region where FNUM is reduced in order to increase the number of molecules in very thin cells near the surface. The reduction is DTM is also desirable because of the thin cells. However, for problems