Download Model-Independent Parameter Estimation Watermark
Transcript
Parallel PEST 10-2 using finite parameter differences, successive model runs are independent, ie. the parameters used for one particular model run do not depend on the results of a previous model run. The complete independence of model runs undertaken as part of the process of filling the Jacobian matrix makes this process easily parallelised. Under these circumstances Parallel PEST simply distributes model runs to different machines or processors as they become available, and processes the outcomes of these runs as they are finished. 10.1.3 Parallelisation of the Marquardt Lambda Testing Process Unlike the Jacobian calculation process, the lambda search process (see Section 2.1.7) is difficult to parallelise. This is because, with the exception of the first two model runs undertaken as part of the lambda search procedure during each optimisation iteration, the Marquardt lambda used at subsequent stages of this procedure is dependent on the results of model runs undertaken on the basis of previous lambda values. Hence it is necessary for PEST to wait until the results of a previous model run have been evaluated before it can undertake a further model run on the basis of a new parameter set calculated using a new Marquardt lambda. However while the lambda search process is not immediately amenable to parallelisation, it is not impossible to accelerate this process somewhat through “partial parallelisation”, thanks to the fact that lambda values used by PEST in this search are all related to each other by multiples of LAMFAC. Thus if PEST is run as Parallel PEST, and if it has access to a number of processors, it can undertake simultaneous model runs across these different processors using parameters calculated on the basis of a series of lambda values related to each other by factors of LAMFAC. To some extent, PEST must “guess” which lambdas to use for these parallelised model runs. If it turns out that some of these lambdas are actually not required, then nothing will have been lost because the respective processors’ contributions to the lambda search procedure would have also been zero if they were undertaking no model runs at all. While Parallel PEST allows such a “partial parallelisation” of the lambda search to be undertaken, parallel lambda runs will not be undertaken: if at least one parameter is frozen at its upper or lower bound, if PEST is running in predictive analysis mode and a line search is undertaken as part of the predictive analysis process, if the model run time for the fastest processor involved in the parallelisation process is less than 1.8 times the model run time for the second fastest processor (see below), if only one slave is currently available for the undertaking of model runs (this may happen if all but one slave is currently completing redundant model runs arising out of the previous parallel Jacobian calculation process), the user indicates to PEST that only the Jacobian matrix calculation process is to be parallelised (see below). The user should take particular note of the first of the above exceptions to PEST’s ability to