Download Self-calibrating precision timing circuit and method for a laser range
Transcript
US 6,445,444 B2 17 18 threshold. By setting the noise ?ring rate, noise pulses are being produced deliberately, all the time and the only Way the best range to a black target. On the other hand, if the target’s very re?ective, a high gain is not required, so the for you to take advantage of that fact is by implementing a ?rmware algorithm in the microcomputer 270 that alloWs you to discriminate betWeen noise pulses and laser return noise rate can be loWered, Which then provides the same probability of a noise pulse appearing over a longer ?ight range, and therefore a quick acquisition on a bright White pulses. What the algorithm does is, during the laser ?ring target can be achieved. Thus, by depressing the mode sWitch 26, different modes of operation of the laser range ?nder 10 process, on the ?rst pulse that ?res, it gets a laser pulse, and it places it in a stack of pulses. For eXample, the stack may can be selected. As an eXample, one mode might be utiliZed to ?nd the range to re?ective road signs out to a distance of have locations designated 0 through 9, to enable 10 pulses to be maintained in the stack. The values of the FLIGHTTIME 10 are saved, corrected for poWer return, (the microcomputer 270 determines the poWer level of the return signal and corrects the ?ight time for poWer return) and placed in one of the locations in the stack. Upon receipt of the neXt pulse, the microcomputer 270 Will then compare the neXt pulse With the remaining locations in the stack. Initially, most of the maXimum range to only 350—400 yards and so a different 15 the locations Will be empty, and there Will be no match. If no 20 25 1. A transimpedance ampli?er comprising: 30 and a third terminal thereof coupled to an input node; a second transistor having ?rst and second terminals 35 results) or, if higher sensitivity Were desired, a match of three through N may be speci?ed, depending on the reli lines and a third terminal thereof coupled to said third 40 could be the real target, folloWed by eight noise pulses, and 45 may then be used to compare all subsequent pulses, rather than needing to place them in a stack and only pulses that match up With that initial match average Will contribute to the measurement. If a certain number of pulses elapse before thereof respectively coupled to said ?rst and second voltage lines and a third terminal thereof coupled to said second terminal of said ?rst transistor; a third transistor having ?rst and second terminals thereof respectively coupled to said second and ?rst voltage ability needed to guarantee a real target and not a noise as long as the ninth pulse is again the real target, the distance to the target can, be accurately determined. The stack can be increased in siZe up to Whatever memory limit is available in the system, depending on hoW far into the noise level the laser range ?nder 10 must Work. Having found a match, the average of the match values a ?rst transistor having ?rst and second terminals thereof respectively coupled to ?rst and second voltage lines pulses Within the preset tolerance (providing very acceptable pulse. In an eXemplary operation, the ?rst pulse (pulse 0) While there have been described above, the principles of the invention in conjunction With speci?c apparatus, it is to be clearly understood that the foregoing description is made only by Way of eXample and not as a limitation on the scope of the invention. What is claimed is: a tolerance of a feW nanoseconds may be set for a match to be assumed to be a real target and not a noise pulse. UtiliZing the algorithm, the process continues, trying to lock on the target until a match is achieved. The match need only be tWo insight, LCD display 32 Wherein the ?rst mode Would correspond to the brightest target or most re?ective target, and the Nth mode Would correspond to the least re?ective target. match is very loW. Because the tolerance can be set as any other ?rmWare parameter, a default value Will be typically loaded that has been determined empirically. As an eXample, operational mode might be selected Which Would otherWise require a relatively long time to hit the road sign, if ever, because there Would alWays be a noise pulse in the Way. The mode sWitch 26 alloWs the setting of these variables to maXimiZe the range of the laser range ?nder 10, depending on the target quality and a visual indication of the target quality selected may be provided to the operator on the match is found, the microcomputer 270 puts the pulse in the stack and carries on, merely placing pulses in the stack, and then When it gets to the top, it goes back and overWrites the base, so you have a history of N number of pulses in the stack. Any time a neW pulse comes in, it compares the entire stack for a match, Where N=10, it searches the preceding ten pulses for a match. The reason for doing that is, since a high noise ?ring rate has been deliberately set to get maXimum sensitivity, many noise pulses are going to have shoWn up, but the noise pulses Will be of random occurrence and the chance of a precision 1000 yards or more. Alternatively, aiming the laser range ?nder 10 at something like Wet black tree bark, might reduce 50 another matching pulse is received, it may be assumed that an accidental lock-on to noise has been achieved and the process restart. By adjusting the various parameters, a trade terminal of said ?rst transistor; and a fourth transistor having ?rst and second terminals thereof respectively coupled to said second and ?rst voltage lines and a third terminal thereof coupled to said second terminal of said third transistor, said ?rst terminal of said fourth transistor being coupled to an output node. 2. The transimpedance ampli?er of claim 1 Wherein said second terminal of said ?rst transistor is resistively coupled to said second voltage line. 3. The transimpedance ampli?er of claim 1 Wherein said ?rst terminal of said second transistor is resistively coupled to said ?rst voltage line. 4. The transimpedance ampli?er of claim 1 Wherein said ?rst terminal of said second transistor is resistively coupled off can be made betWeen the time it takes to get a measure 55 to said third terminal of said ?rst transistor. ment to hoW far into the noise the laser range ?nder to must 5. The transimpedance ampli?er of claim 1 Wherein said Work. Because the noise rate can set to Whatever is desired second terminal of said third transistor is resistively coupled by means of the automatic noise threshold section 36, it is maXimum ?ight time is also less, so a higher noise rate can to said ?rst voltage line. 6. The transimpedance ampli?er of claim 1 Wherein said ?rst terminal of said fourth transistor is resistively coupled to said second voltage line. 7. The transimpedance ampli?er of claim 1 Wherein said second terminal of said fourth transistor is resistively coupled to said ?rst voltage line. 8. The transimpedance ampli?er of claim 7 Wherein said second terminal of said fourth transistor is further capaci be tolerated. Therefore, running at a higher gain Will provide tively coupled to said ?rst voltage line. possible to optimiZe the algorithm to provide the optimum acquisition characteristics against time and against range. 60 The higher the value of V3, the more noise is coming out of the receiver, and the more sensitive the laser receive section 22 is running. The probability of a noise pulse shoWing up is proportional to the ?ight time, so given a very “black” target, the maXimum range Will be less, but the 65