Download Here - Marcus Mattsson

Group 151 – VIS.MED.FILM – P1 2008
The
girl
thought
it
was
a
good
and
different
way
of
making
a
film
to
inform
about
an
education.
She
also
mentioned
the
yellow
man
as
a
good
way
of
putting
a
story
in
the
film
instead
of
a
lot
of
boring
information
being
stuffed
into
ones
head.
She
found
it
obvious
from
the
film
that
there
was
a
lot
of
work
in
groups
at
the
study,
because
people
in
groups,
designing
and
discussing,
were
shown
all
the
time.
She
noticed
that
there
is
a
lot
of
focus
on
solving
problems
at
the
education
and
called
Medialogy
a
"Problem‐Solving‐Education".
"Man
sidder
jo
ikke
bare
og
læser
en
bog,
men
man
gør
det
selv,
ik’?
Man
prøver
at
praktisere
det
en
lille
smule,
de
teorier
man
har."
(Translation:
One
doesn't
just
read
in
a
book,
but
does
it
oneself,
right?
Trying
to
use
ones
theories
a
bit
in
practice.)
(Quote
from
the
interview
on
the
DVD
at
time
code
8:55
to
9:01.)
The
only
thing
she
thought
was
bad
in
the
film
was
the
lack
of
concrete
information
about
the
admission
requirements,
where
Medialogy
can
be
studied
and
so
on.
The
girl
was
quite
sure
that
the
study
had
great
interest
for
her.
She
found
the
way
of
working
at
Medialogy
really
good
and
exiting.
The
thing
that
made
her
a
bit
insecure
of
whether
the
study
was
the
right
one
for
her
or
not
was,
that
she
noticed
that
there
is
a
lot
of
independent
work
on
research
and
discovering
information
and
she
preferred
to
get
given
facts,
better
than
searching,
analyzing
and
discussing
material.
The
boy
found
it
really
good
that
the
information
was
shown
in
this
different
way,
so
that
one
doesn't
just
see
a
list
of
the
courses
at
the
education,
but
see
some
of
the
work
made
earlier,
how
students
work
at
Medialogy
and
the
products
made
there;
one
gets
a
quick
overview
of
how
things
are
done
at
the
education.
He
thought
it
was
easy
to
see
that
the
main
work
was
done
in
groups,
due
to
the
things
written
on
the
blackboard,
seeing
people
discussing,
developing
and
testing
products
together
and
since
the
products
were
pretty
advanced,
he
thought
it
was
necessary
to
work
together
with
others.
He
had
answered,
in
the
questionnaire,
that
the
beginning
phase
was
to
choose
a
product,
because
he
noticed
a
lot
of
development
and
designing
in
a
different
way
during
the
process,
but
he
also
noticed
a
lot
of
focus
on
the
problems,
so
he
actually
wanted
to
answer
both,
but
had
chosen
the
first.
He
felt
totally
informed
after
seeing
the
film.
He
thought
that,
for
a
film
at
approximately
5
minutes,
he
had
learned
a
lot.
He
had
gotten
all
the
information
necessary,
because
he
thought
that
all
the
more
concrete
and
practical
things
could
be
found
afterwards.
One
was
given
a
good
view
of
the
education,
what
it
consists
of,
the
way
of
working
and
solving
a
problem,
in
a
way
that
a
brochure
could
not
have
done.
"Hvis
I
både
lavede
en
film,
men
samtidig
havde
en
folder
med,
(...),
så
ville
man
jo
have
alt
hvad
man
havde
brug
for
i
løbet
af
5
minutter."
(Translation:
If
you
both
made
a
film,
but
at
the
same
time
brought
a
brochure
(...),
then
one
would
have
everything
necessary
in
5
minutes)
(Quote
from
interview
on
the
DVD
at
time
code
6:54
to
7:04)
He
suggested,
if
the
film
should
be
used
for
branding,
that
the
film
should
be
shown
as
it
is,
but
that
one
should
bring
brochures
with
more
practical
information
about
the
education,
that
people,
if
they
Page
62
of
80