Download PUB517 Usability problem reports
Transcript
43 on identifying problems and consistency across analysts is not very likely to be improved by using specific analysis methods; (2) re-analysis of the same data is very likely to lead to a slightly higher thoroughness in the second analysis even if the second analysis is done one or two months later (in this case in the range of 1-4%); (3) within-analyst consistency does seem to be sensitive to the used analysis method; using the SlimDEVAN method in subsequent analyses led to within-analyst consistencies of 63-72%, whereas within-analyst consistencies of labs using different methods in their first and second analyses were, on average 50%. Implications In usability studies that are based on comparing problems, it is important that all data are analyzed by the same analysts. This is important because of the inherent subjectivity in extracting usability problems from observations. With appropriate methods that conform to the characteristics as present in SlimDEVAN and as mentioned in section 5.1, within-analyst consistency can be improved. Also, such methods make the findings inspectable. Inspectability is important for laying bare subjective parts in data analyses and for making sure that outside reviewers can falsify or confirm the findings. In comparative usability studies inspectability is also important for a thorough understanding of the reported problems. This is crucial for being able to decide on similarity of problems. REFERENCES Barendregt, W., & Bekker, M.M. (2005). Developing a coding scheme for detecting usability and fun problems in computer games for young children. Proceedings of Measuring Behaviour 2005, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Cockton G., Lavery D. & Woolrych A. (2002). Inspection-based evaluations. In J. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.) The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications, (pp. 1118 - 1138) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Daams, B. & Hariandja J. (2006). Cross-cultural usability, testing a food processor in Indonesia and the Netherlands. Proceedings of IEA2006: 16th World Congress on Ergonomics IEA2006 , 1-5, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.