Download Microdata User Guide
Transcript
Maternity Experiences Survey, 2006 – User Guide Distribution (percentage) for each Source of Estimates Variables Unresolved / Non-respondents Less than 20 Mother’s age at birth Entire MES Frame 5.3 2.6 3.2 3.3 47.0 44.4 45.3 44.6 30 to 39 41.7 49.4 48.0 47.4 English Place of residence Respondents (Final weights) 20 to 29 40 and over Mother’s first language Respondents (Design weights) 7.9 3.6 3.6 4.7 58.3 61.4 61.6 61.0 French 14.7 23.6 21.5 21.7 Other 27.0 15.0 16.9 17.2 Non-CMA 27.4 33.7 32.5 32.2 CMA 47.3 50.9 50.1 50.0 Toronto 25.3 15.4 17.5 17.8 Mother’s marital status Never married 34.8 30.4 29.6 30.8 Other 65.2 69.6 70.4 69.2 Number of adults in household (aged 18 and over) Less than 2 11.8 4.2 4.2 5.7 2 and over 88.2 95.8 95.8 94.3 Other children (aged 0 to 15) No 40.1 42.9 42.8 42.3 Yes 59.9 57.1 57.2 57.7 Male 52.4 51.8 51.7 51.6 Female 47.6 48.2 48.3 48.4 Baby’s gender The results of this study show that the characteristics of the non-respondents and unresolved cases tend to be different from those of the respondents. The study also shows that the respondents, after the weighting adjustments for non-response, appear to be fairly representative for the variables available for the study. To illustrate this conclusion, consider the proportion of cases where the Mother's first language is neither English nor French: The proportion is 27.0% for the non-respondent and unresolved cases, and 15.0% for the respondents using the design weights. After the weighting adjustments, the proportion is 16.9% for the respondents compared to 17.2% for the MES frame. This shows that although the proportion was quite different for the non-respondent / unresolved cases compared to the respondent cases, the weighting adjustments helped compensate for this difference, and improved the representation of the sample. 8.2.5 Measurement of Sampling Error Since it is an unavoidable fact that estimates from a sample survey are subject to sampling error, sound statistical practice calls for researchers to provide users with some indication of the magnitude of this sampling error. This section of the documentation outlines the measures of sampling error which Statistics Canada commonly uses and which it urges users producing estimates from this microdata file to use also. The basis for measuring the potential size of sampling errors is the standard error of the estimates derived from survey results. Special Surveys Division 29