Download CUE Rules

Experienced User Subset
SUMI Scoring Report from SUMISCO 7.38Time and date of analysis: 20:59:34 on
03-09-1998Files used in this analysis:
SUMI English (UK) Language Items
SUMI Version 2.1 Scoring Keys
distributions from January 1996 standardisation
weights from January 1996 standardisation
population parameters from January 1996 standardisation
Data file analysed: tte.ASC: Task Timer for Windows 6/3/98 Expert user subset
Number of users analysed: 10
Profile Analysis
Scale
UF
Ucl
Medn Lcl
LF
Global
69
59
51
43
33
Efficiency
65
58
51
44
29
Affect
86
71
64
56
23
Helpfulness
77
51
44
36
20
Control
65
55
49
42
35
Learnability 84
70
61
51
36
In general, slightly more up-beat than the Low experienced Windows users, but note
the poor Helpfulness scores, and the generally low Control, Efficiency and Global
scores.Note: The Median is the middle score when the scores are arranged in
numerical order. It is the indicative sample statistic for each usability scale.
The Ucl and Lcl are the Upper and Lower Confidence Limits. They represent the
limits within which the theoretical true score lies 95% of the time for this sample of
users.
The UF and LF are the Upper and Lower Fences. They represent values beyond
which it may be plausibly suspected that a user is not responding with the rest of the
group: the user may be responding with an outlier.
Individual User Scores
User
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Globa
52
53
23
67
57
50
45
49
Effic
50
52
24
53
52
40
44
55
Affec
44
63
32
66
65
56
42
64
Helpf
40
55
44
58
65
43
35
32
Contr
53
45
24
61
55
49
48
45
Learn
52
68
27
71
61
59
60
62
1E
3E
2E (GECL)
5E
6E
7E
10E
12E
Task Timer for Windows Evaluation by CO. X.
Page 30 of 40